Skip to content

Essay On Corporate Governance And Social Responsibility

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

1.0 Introduction

2.0 Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Overview
2.1 Corporate Social Responsibility Framework

3.0 Why Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility

4.0 Johnson & Johnson Overview

5.0 Johnson & Johnson’s Strategies
5.1 Customers
5.2 Employees
5.3 Communities and the Environment
5.4 Shareholders

6.0 Conclusion

7.0 Recommendations

Appendices

References

Executive Summary

The purpose of this report is to discuss the reasons behind the increased interest in Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in recent years and how Johnson & Johnson’s (J&J) utilizes the two concepts in its day-to-day business.

CSR is an extended model of Corporate Governance, to be successful in its CSR program; a company must be successful in its Corporate Governance.

The two main reasons for the increased interest in the two concepts are recent scandals and shareholder activism. First, the recent accounting scandals caused public outrage around the world; executives took full advantage of weak Corporate Governance oversight and guidelines, and deliberately exploited the agency-principal trust. Second, recently corporations must face shareholder activism through the growth of Social Responsible Investors.

Johnson & Johnson’s focus on Corporate Governance and CSR goes back to its founding family. Chairman Robert Wood Johnson, son of company founder Robert Wood Johnson, wrote J&J’s Credo in 1943. The Credo, written long before the term CSR was coined, is a true piece of Corporate Governance and CSR guidelines, because it explains in clear terms that J&J is responsible to its customers, employees and the environment before its shareholders. Its strong commitment to Corporate Governance and CSR has earned them numerous awards for excellence in these areas.

J&J have satisfied owners by providing 75 consecutive years with increased sales and 45 consecutive years with increased dividends. The company proofs to the neo-classical theorists that Corporate Governance and CSR are not purely associated with high cost.

J&J exemplifies why corporations in the future will continue their efforts in taking all stakeholders into account when decisions are made. This report presents the development of Corporate Governance and CSR over the past century with a focus on historic overview, recent scandals and J&J.

1.0 Introduction

The purpose of this report is to discuss the reasons behind the increased interest in Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in recent years and how Johnson & Johnson (J&J) utilizes the two concepts in its day-to-day business. First, the report gives an overview of Corporate Governance and CSR, and discusses the recent scandals in the corporate world. The second part focuses on J&J’s Corporate Governance and CSR practices. The company communicates its Credo through its actions towards its customers, employees, communities and environment as well as its shareholders.

2.0 Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Overview

CSR is an extended model of Corporate Governance, to be successful in its CSR program; a company must be successful in its Corporate Governance. While Corporate Governance deals with the internal handling of the company, like accounting procedures and general business ethics, CSR specifically deals with stakeholders like the environment and the communities.

CSR has evolved from a controversial topic to one of the most accepted concepts of today’s globalized and business oriented world (Lee, 2008). It is argued that the father of CSR is Howard Bowen with his book Social Responsibilities of the Business Man from 1953 (Carroll, 1999). Bowen argued that business men ought to assume responsibility for the system of free enterprise and act thereafter for the system to flourish (Maak, 2008). The ongoing debate whether corporations should be socially responsible has lasted since the publication of Bowen’s book (Enquist, Johnson and Skalen, 2006). On one side, the Neo-Classic Theorists, led by former Nobel Prize winner Milton Friedman and CEO TJ Rodgers, argue that the only responsibility a firm has to society is to increase profits (Enquist et al., 2006; Boatright, 2001). In 1970, Friedman argued that shareholders would suffer because of higher costs associated with CSR (Maak, 2008). On the other side, R. Edward Freeman and others argue that disconnecting business from ethics is impossible (Freeman, 1994). In 1984, Freeman introduced the Stakeholder Theory; he believed that shareholders are not the only part of the equation corporations ought to listen to; all stakeholders need to have their voices heard (Freeman, 1994). Furthermore, in 1995 Freeman’s ideas were expanded, with a new focus on moral and ethical dimension by the authors Donaldson and Preston (Donaldson and Preston, 1995). Many academics have tried over the years to define CSR, but the increased popularity the past 20 years has caused academics to argue that lack of definition has made theoretical development and measurement difficult (Godfrey and Hatch, 2007). A recent, but widely accepted definition was created by McWilliams, Siegel and Wright (2006, p.1) and they believe CSR can be defined as “situations where the firm goes beyond compliance and engages in actions that appear to further some social good, beyond the interests of the firm and that which is required by law”.

2.1 Corporate Social Responsibility Framework

In 1991, Archie Carroll built a foundation for further development of the CSR field by creating “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility” (Appendix A) with four identified components: economic, ethical, legal and discretionary or philanthropic (Carroll, 1999). The model creates a framework that embraces the entire spectrum of society, but critics questioned the necessity of naming philanthropic as a single component (Malachowski, 2001). As a consequence, Carroll updated the model and renamed it “The Three-Domain Model of CSR” (Appendix B) where the three components are: economic, legal and ethical (Schwartz and Carroll, 2003). Carroll argues that the three components are all equally important and interact with each other, where some corporations might be labelled “purely ethical” or “purely legal” whereas other can be labelled as “economic/legal” and at last some can be also labelled as combination of all three, “economic, legal and ethical” (Schwartz and Carroll, 2003 p. 509).

3.0 Why Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility

Most leaders of the investment and business community did not recognize the importance of the concept of Corporate Governance and CSR until the late 1970s (Lydenberg, 2005). In fact, less than half of the Fortune 500 corporations listed CSR in their annual reports in 1977, however, by 1999, this increased to almost 90% (Boli and Hartsuiker, 2001). Even though corporations established Codes of Conduct, it was not before the beginning of the 21st century that corporations complied with their own guidelines (Lee, 2008). The two main reasons for the increased interest in the two concepts are recent scandals and shareholder activism.

First, the recent scandals at Enron, Ahold, Parmalat, HIH and others caused public outrage around the world; executives took full advantage of weak corporate governance oversight and guidelines, and deliberately exploited the agency-principal trust. As a consequence of the widespread abuse, both the U.S congress and the European Parliament passed legislation and directives in an attempt to strengthen the position of Corporate Governance (IFC, 2008). The United States passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002 and the European Union passed the Action Plan for Modernizing European Company Law and Enhancing Corporate Governance in 2003 (IFC, 2008). As a result, Corporate Governance and CSR have grown to be major issues in every boardroom because of the dire consequences of breaking the law. The former CEO of Enron, Jeffrey Skilling, serves a 24 year sentence in prison, and recently Bernard Madoff received 150 years because of his ponzi scheme, which caused his clients to lose an estimated USD 65 Billion (Tse, 2009). Consequently, the scandals have launched a debate on the essential question of corporate governance: why does a corporation exist, who does it serve and who does it owe loyalty to? (Letza, Kirkbride, Sun and Smallman, 2008)

[...]

Corporate Governance And Social Responsibility Essay

AbstractThe formal definition of social responsibility is "management's obligation to make choices and take actions that will contribute to the welfare and interests of society as well as the organisation." However, it is not as straightforward as it may seem. Having social citizenship means putting managerial ethics to practice and work. So how can we measure social responsibility of one company's ethical decision? With the competing demands from different stakeholders, CSR is becoming more important in an organisation.

1.Is there any conflict between profits and social goals?The answer is "Yes" and "No". We live in the 21st century's world which is well developed and connected environment, comparing to the old time. There are over 6 billion people and millions of companies in the world try to survive and as well as not crossing the others rights. To create the wealth for themselves, they do something which is to fulfil the others' needs. This is called a "business". To do business, people can organise themselves in a group which is called corporate or organisation. In other words, a business can be defined as an organisation that strives for profits while meeting the needs of its customers and employees and balancing the impact of its actions to other stakeholders. The main aim of it is to make profit. On the other hand, they also have social responsibility. Social responsibility means you are should be accountable for your actions and keeping your agreement as well as the ability to be ethical. Of course there is conflict between social goals and profits. To increase its main target of profit the firm can save and spend less money and only invest for its growth. For example: Use of child labour, the use of not environmentally friendly technology or not fair competition etc. But also company can increase its profit while contributing social goals according to the theory of the American famous economist Milton Friedman . In these days, big firms use Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as one of the most important tool to increase its profit. CSR is a management model that promotes ethical conduct and values for businesses by creating public relations policies to promote these practices to publics and stakeholders. Companies like BP, Shell, Ford, EDF Energy and a large number of other multinational and smaller organisations are beginning to, or already have taken the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility very seriously. As a business the firm should work for profit. But a business firm without a social responsibility may not be able to survive. Also there is a strong positive relationship between levels of social responsibility and ethic. Social responsibility has become increasingly important in order to strengthen firm's market value. Obviously the company success is to maximize its market value....

Loading: Checking Spelling

0%

Read more

Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Success

1208 words - 5 pages Introduction There has been a seismic shift in how companies market themselves and their respective goods and services. The primary reason for the shift seems to be a changing consumer base; one that incorporates social, environmental and ethical issues into their buying decisions. Pressure from these more socially conscious consumers has driven companies to adopt more robust corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategies in order not only...

Levi's: Corporate Social Responsibility Essay

3702 words - 15 pages 1.0IntroductionAs recently as a decade ago, many companies viewed business ethics only in terms of compliance with legal standards and adherence to internal rules and regulations. Driven by a range of new challenges and opportunities, the field of business ethics is fast breaking out of that compliance-based silo. Beyond legal compliance and government regulations, consumer, shareholder and stakeholder expectations also compel companies to...

Corporate Social Responsibility

2454 words - 10 pages Corporate Social Responsibility Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a very controversial topic. A question that has been debated for the past few decades is; is it corporately viable to introduce social responsibility as a proposed addition to the work ethic of business organisations. As well as, if adopting the framework of corporate social responsibility would yield positive improvements for those organisations. The purpose of...

Corporate social responsibility

778 words - 3 pages Corporate social responsibility is a business philosophy that stresses the importance of keeping the best interests of the wider society in mind.The World Business Council for Sustainable Development in its publication Making Good Business Sense by Lord Holme and Richard Watts, used the following definition.'Corporate...

Corporate Social Responsibility CSR

1295 words - 5 pages Corporate social responsibility ‘Corporate social responsibility’ (CSR) means that the firm has wider responsibilities in relation to objectives and people apart from the owners or shareholders (Beal and Goyen 2005). These responsibilities are achieved when the firm adapts all of its practices to ensure that it operates in ways that meet, or exceed, the ethical, legal, commercial and public expectations that society has of business. Objectives...

Corporate Social Responsibility

1437 words - 6 pages In order to answer the main question of this study, a literature study was carried out to find out how Corporate Social Responsibility in literature was defined; what the role of stakeholders, specifically employees was in job advertisements. Furthermore, the theory of Person-Organization fit was explained and the different work motivation theories are discussed. 2.1 Corporate Social Responsibility Last couple of years Corporate Social...

Corporate Social Responsibility

1044 words - 4 pages In a recent time companies are giving more attention to develop a CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) and mainly their core values. Core values are used in marketing strategies (Berry, 1999) also in customer-retention management in order to create distinctive, long-lasting relationships with customers (Prahald and Ramaswamy, 2004; Normann, 2001) and stakeholders (Pruzan, 1998; Post et a, 2002). The interaction with a stakeholder and concerns a...

Corporate Social Responsibility

2054 words - 8 pages In recent years, companies are becoming socially responsible and now stakeholders almost expect a company to have CSR policies. Therefore, in twentieth century, corporate social responsibility (CSR) became an important development in public life (Barnett, ND).Corporate social responsibility is defined as “the ways in which an organisation exceeds the minimum obligations to stakeholders specified through regulation and corporate governance”...

Corporate Social Responsibility

1811 words - 7 pages Organizations realize that it is important to attract highly skilled and qualified employees, because these employees are a necessary component of the competitive advantage that organizations want to achieve (Greening & Turban, 2000). Corporate Social Responsible actions of an organization can be a manner to attract highly skilled and qualified employees, because prior research assumes that organization’s CSR activities comprise a legitimate and...

Corporate Social Responsibility

885 words - 4 pages 1. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is commonly known as responsibilities that are held responsible by the corporate in a social context (Wood et al. 2013, 27). Such examples are charitable events, providing jobs and upgrading of new skills, listening to what the society needs and amendments (mallenbaker 2013). CSR can be...

What's Corporate Social Responsibility

2428 words - 10 pages “Corporate Social Responsibility” “Corporations today are under a microscope. Virtually every aspect of operations is subject to scrutiny by consumers.” According to Ogilvy, If CSR issues are managed well, there will be opportunities for a company to build its reputation and differentiate itself. In today’s society, what you stand for as an organization matters way more than what you produce, sell or what services you provide. CSR is a commonly...